Over 200,000 International Readers have engaged our periodic insights plus the regular curated digest of research, commentary and ideas from top global investors, economists, scientists, experts and media; focusing on Humanity's "BIG 7 Es" as they pertain to economics, investing and wealth concepts. Meshing to create an existential approach in these subjects that aims to fully embed and recognize physical and scientific constraints.
Does this mean we should land on the moon again for bargains? Folks could be waiting there right now looking for our business. Who we wonder?
Commodity prices are ready to shoot upwards whether there is a war in Syria or any big event somewhere else on the planet. Syria is somewhat irrelevant in this regard as markets are poised more on fundamentals to lift skyward.
The world is more fragile today than it was twenty years ago for obvious reasons. More people, fewer resources and wider geo-political tensions and instability. For more worries you may add in climate change, wildfires, water supplies and worst - fewer and fewer pollinating bugs. And that's the war we are really losing sleep over.
Bottom Line: Anyday, anything, or anytime - LIFT OFF ALICE!
Just cannot see eye to eye with Jim on the collapse of the US dollar, albeit the financial calamity is more or less a hangover from the 2008 Meltdown and remains plausible. Indeed we had forecasted such a collapse two years back, by 2020. Bonds yes; but a currency short is fraught with too many pitfalls.
There are many reasons behind the likely stability embedded in the US dollar in such times. Two are big ones. One, it will simply win by default because other currencies that are competitive, in any significant way, should be that much worse off in the turbulent economic times ahead. Remember, the US is a Hegemony with about 60 -70% of the world's resources and economies within its influences and/or control. There is little else in terms of a viable surrogate exchange media that could handle the global financial volume and liquidity needs as well. Former communist countries have huge credibility issues to overcome to garner any trust for this role.
But most importantly - they have bigger GUNS! In the end, that may be all that matters.
While we have long held a position that in the long-run there is no legitimate or logical reason based on sequential forward events, and both historical asset-class performance and purchasing power losses over the past thirty-three years to own this object, yet this psychotic placebo continues to attract the attention of speculators. Nouriel Roubini had candidly referred to it as a "barbaric relic" - his kind diplomacy is respected.
So why do promoters such as Dr Doom continue with there promotions despite all this? We can presume that they understand the psychosis of small investors attracted to such a cure all placebo and operate to take advantage of their fantasy. The above purchase of Sprott affirms the possibility of such a tactic by promoters.
But the most important issue is not whether to buy or sell this object - the real issue is disclosure. That is will the promoters advise the public of subsequent sales before they are effected or will they cleverly front-run them in various de facto forms ahead of small investors, underneath the radar of a complex myriad of international rules, laws and regulations?
Funny thing, we really don't expect answers to these questions any time soon.
ago we actually concluded that without Steve Jobs the company would not
be able to repeat or meet the achievements or expectations of its
founder. There is an artistic-creative element in people of Steve's
character that cannot be replicated by professionally trained managers
from Ivy-league business schools. Moreover, entrepreneurial vision and drive is a talent few ever configure in a similar way.
whether its Ford, Buffet, Carnegie, Gates, Stronich or Jobs, their
unique compositions are rare and the companies they build and run are
never the same once they move on.
Keeping Apple on the watch list, but our vision for the future remains short-sighted.
primary rule of investing - when the Company's top executives start
dumping their shares, it's time to head for the hills. We are not going
to set out all the reasons why and all the excuses executives use to
justify their dispositions. Nope, instead we are going to ask you to
look at the fellow captioned above and ask "what if this guy started dumping shares in that small town company from Omaha?"
Never happened, and if it did - you know that the flood waters are really coming.
all boils down to how do you believe in folks that do not believe in
themselves? Just plain-old folksy small-town stuff. There is however-
one City-slicker - Jimmy Rogers, who thinks that Facebook is not an investment, its a waste of time. We agreed with him then, and still do. This also may explain why Facebook users are so depressed - they finally figured out Jim's astute observation.
Stockholders may soon join its users, as t is still just a click away from ten or less, on the Ticker.
First Financial Insights
August 14, 2013
" Facebook is not an investment, it's a waste of time"
TORONTO CONDO bubble CRASHING – WHAT NEXT? - READ MORE 2008 Meltdown or Japanese Bubble... (read more)
will they ever learn? Or is it simply in the nature of our species to
always create these gigantic credit-driven asset bubbles? And why is it a
social phenomenon that no country, culture or region is immune to
a investment view, we are seriously perturbed about Toronto's Condo
Bubble and the possible outcomes that could occur when the bubble
further deflates. As a result, we have placed a number of sectors on our
watch list; obviously including retail, financial, property
development and construction industries. In the weeks ahead, we will
provide further.comments and analysis regarding the much anticipated
fall-out with more specific industry assessments.
also how globalization was sold to us as the best way to improve
national economic well-being, standards of living, create jobs and lower
risk levels. Now everything is so deeply inter-connected financially,
physically and politically, yet these promised improvements seem to be
moving us in the opposite direction. Do you think it was all a big lie
serving a few special global interests? Do you think that they pulled
the wool over the eyes of our political geniuses? If you do - then you
are not alone!
begs the question - who is really governing sovereign nations given all
the operative trade agreements, and organizations, such as the WTO, EU,
IMF, World Bank and others, with relegated powers? Have all these
supra-constitutional connections watered-down sovereign constitutions so
much that national destinies have been moved beyond elected officials'
powers? This may explain why Canada patterned its monetary policies
after the FED - they have to!
is a big issue that requires a good deal more analysis and thought, but
there are clear hints that "globalization" was just a crafty synonym
disguising "annexation". What does that have to do with the price of
Condo's in Toronto?